City of Colorado Springs Logo
File #: 15-00577    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Case Status: Passed
File created: 9/8/2015 In control: City Council
On agenda: 10/13/2015 Final action: 10/13/2015
Title: An appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of an appeal of an administrative approval of a non-use variance to allow a 2.3 foot side yard setback where 5 feet are required, located at 5675 Majestic Drive. Quasi-Judicial
Attachments: 1. Appeal Statement-Majestic, 2. 5675 Majestic Council presentation 101315, 3. CPC Appellant Picture of property line, 4. CPC Applicant presentation, 5. 5675 Majestic Appeal CPC Agenda staff report, 6. CPC Minutes August 20 2015-Majestic, 7. Criteria-7.5.802.B-Nonuse Variance, 8. Criteria-7.5.803.B-Appeal


Title
An appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of an appeal of an administrative approval of a non-use variance to allow a 2.3 foot side yard setback where 5 feet are required, located at 5675 Majestic Drive.
Quasi-Judicial


Body
From:
Peter Wysocki, Planning and Development Director, Planning and Development Department

Summary:
This is an appeal of the Planning Commission's action to deny the appeal of an administrative decision to approve a non-use variance to allow a 2.3 foot side yard setback where 5 feet are required.

Previous Council Action:
None

Background:
Upon learning of the appeal of Planning Commission's decision, the original applicant - Scott Hente of Robert-Scott General Contractors, Inc. - requested that City Council postpone the hearing to the October 13, 2015 Council meeting. On September 22, 2015 City Council unanimously postponed the hearing as requested.

In July of 2015 Planning Staff administratively approved a side yard setback variance allowing a 2.3 foot side setback where 5 feet are required in the Parkside at Mountain Shadows PUD zone. The variance allowed the existing single-family home foundation to remain in place as constructed. The adjacent neighbor to the east appealed the administrative approval to the City's Planning Commission. The Planning Commission staff report provides additional detail on the original application and the neighbor's appeal.

Financial Implications:
Not applicable.

Board/Commission Recommendation:
At their meeting on August 20, 2015 the Planning Commission failed to approve the appeal of Staff's administrative approval with a vote of 3-3. The fact that a majority of the Planning Commissioners did not support the appeal resulted in a denial.

Stakeholder Process:
Planning Staff contacted the neighboring property owner (the appellant) and the Home Owner Association representative via phone shortly after the application was submitted. Pri...

Click here for full text



The City of Colorado Springs is committed to making its websites accessible to the widest possible audience. We are constantly working to increase the accessibility and usability of our online technology. We strive to maintain conformance to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 as well as U.S. Federal Government Section 508 Guidelines. The City of Colorado Springs will be evaluating this site on a regular basis, and it will continue to evolve and improve over time as new technologies emerge. Documents created by third parties may not meet all accessibility criteria. If you experience difficulty accessing the information contained within this webpage, please contact the Office of Accessibility at 719-385-5169.