Legislation Details

File #: 21-333    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Informational Report Status: Passed
File created: 6/10/2021 In control: City Council Work Session
On agenda: 6/21/2021 Final action: 6/21/2021
Title: John Mullins v. The City of Colorado Springs, Brian Kelly, Christopher Mace, Mark Neuenfeldt and John Does (1-5), Case No. 21-CV-00589 The Civil Action Investigation Committee has recommended that the City represent the above-named officers as required by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act and the Peace Officer's Liability Act. The officers were acting in the course and scope of their employment and were acting in good faith. As usual, it is recommended that the City reserve the right not to pay any award of punitive damages. Presenter: Wynetta Massey, City Attorney
Attachments: 1. Council memo Mullins

 

Title

John Mullins v. The City of Colorado Springs, Brian Kelly, Christopher Mace, Mark Neuenfeldt and John Does (1-5), Case No. 21-CV-00589

The Civil Action Investigation Committee has recommended that the City represent the above-named officers as required by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act and the Peace Officer’s Liability Act. The officers were acting in the course and scope of their employment and were acting in good faith. As usual, it is recommended that the City reserve the right not to pay any award of punitive damages.

 

  Presenter: 

Wynetta Massey, City Attorney

 

Body

  Summary:

John Mullins v. The City of Colorado Springs, Brian Kelly, Christopher Mace, Mark Neuenfeldt and John Does (1-5), Case No. 21-CV-00589

The Civil Action Investigation Committee has recommended that the City represent the above-named officers as required by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act and the Peace Officer’s Liability Act. The officers were acting in the course and scope of their employment and were acting in good faith. As usual, it is recommended that the City reserve the right not to pay any award of punitive damages.

 

  Background: 

N/A

  Previous Council Action:

N/A

 

  Financial Implications:

N/A

 

  City Council Appointed Board/Commission/Committee Recommendation:

N/A

 

  Stakeholder Process:

N/A

 

  Alternatives:

N/A

 

Recommended Action

  Proposed Motion:

N/A

 

Summary of Ordinance Language

N/A