topics such as mobility, economic vitality, public realm, culture,
infrastructure, and utilities. Mr. Tefertiller highlighted the large-scale
community engagement effort, thousands of survey responses and
numerous events, and noted that the plan is consistent with the City’s
comprehensive plan and zoning code purpose statements.
Chelsea Gondeck, CEO of the Downtown Partnership, emphasized that
the plan reflects extensive stakeholder input and represents a roadmap for
downtown’s next chapter. She underscored that many residents and
business owners felt genuine ownership of the plan and its priorities. Chris
Lieber, NES, former chair of the DDA, expressed the DDA board’s strong
support, citing robust public engagement and the plan’s value in promoting
public-private partnerships and continued economic and physical growth.
Elly Schaefer, Senior Project Manager, MIG Inc., provided a detailed
overview of the plan, including its broad community engagement, updated
goals and vision, and significant new content from the prior plan. She
described major themes raised by the public, small business support,
safety and cleanliness, homelessness, mobility, arts and culture, density,
and the need for a downtown grocery store, and walked through highlights
of each chapter. These included updated building height analysis, catalytic
sites, mobility and trail integration, public-realm and urban design
strategies, cultural and creative economy initiatives, and infrastructure
considerations. Board members asked questions about building height
treatment, homelessness, pedestrian oriented streets, form-based code
sector adjustments, creek corridor activation, safety, housing diversity, and
potential boundary expansions. Ms. Gondeck and Mr. Tefertiller addressed
these questions, noting where items were incorporated into the plan and
here subsequent form-based code updates would tackle more specific
regulatory details.
After concluding public comment, which included no speakers in support or
opposition, Chair Lord expressed strong appreciation for the extensive
work by staff and partners, noting how far downtown has progressed since
earlier decades. Board member Friesema highlighted the plan’s ambition
and stated that its clear goals would give the Board greater leverage in
advocating for bold updates to the form-based code, emphasizing the
importance of aligning zoning tools with the vision. Board member Sokol
praised the plan’s breadth and offered several reflections, including the
need to consider sound mitigation along the I-25 corridor, the potential
expansion of parking-minimum exemptions beyond the core, and clarifying
language about the history of adjacent neighborhoods. Board member