MX-N/HS-O-/WUI-O (Mixed-Use Neighborhood Scale with Hillside and
Wildland Urban Interface overlays) to MX-M/HS-O/WUI-O (Mixed-Use
Medium Scale with Hillside and Wildland Urban Interface Overlay). She
provided an overview of the site, vicinity map, application, project
summary, site background, timeline of review, stakeholder involvement,
agency review, compliance with PlanCOS, review criteria, and optional
motions.
Luanne Ducett, President, Terra Nova Engineering, Applicant’s Consultant,
went over the application for a zoning map amendment for 330, 360, and
390 Elkton Drive, project statement description, justification, site map, and
review criteria.
Mike Jansen, Owner, Developer, and Operator, Point of the Pines
Gardens, representing the applicant, provided an overview of
review/recommendations, reasons/background for the zoning map
amendment, current zoning map, details on proposed new development,
site plan overlay to satellite image of site, and request for approval.
There were no public comments on this item.
Councilmember Henjum asked who owns the lot noted as preservation
area/utility easement and if it will remain in perpetuity. Ms. Jansen stated
he owns all three parcels and when they re-subdivided the land, they only
took what was needed for development and left the rest as preservation.
Ms. Baxter stated the preservation easement was established with the final
plat and any changes would require an amendment.
Councilmember Donelson asked why this area was zoned MX-N with the
adoption of the new Unified Development Code (UDC). Mike Tassi,
Assistant Director, Planning and Community Development, stated when the
UDC was being considered, the original plan was to combine the OR
Zoning District and the OCD Zoning District into the MXN District but after
a lot of dialogue with Council, the decision, guidance, and direction was to
split those apart, keep OR intact but change OC to MXN. He stated in the
negotiations prior to the meeting at Planning Commission with the Historic
Neighborhoods Partnership there was a lot of shifting of allowed uses
between the OC District and the OR District to make it more amenable but
when they guided the consultant to fix that, it did not get corrected. Mr.
Tassi stated this will be mentioned as one of the of the omissions and
errors update to the Code because it was the City’s intent to make this a
nonpermitted use.