Regional Development  
Center (Hearing Room)  
2880 International Circle  
City of Colorado Springs  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
City Planning Commission  
Wednesday, March 11, 2026  
9:00 AM  
2880 International Cir., 2nd Floor, Hearing Room  
1. Call to Order and Roll Call  
8 -  
Present:  
Chair Hensler, Commissioner Cecil, Commissioner Slattery,  
Commissioner Robbins, Commissioner Clements, Commissioner  
Gigiano, Commissioner Willoughby and Commissioner Case  
2. Changes to Agenda/Postponements  
3. Communications  
Kenneth Casey - Planning Commission Chair  
Kevin Walker - Planning Director  
Kevin Walker, City Planning Director, said City Council had approved  
the rezoning and land use plan associated with the Palmer High School  
property; however, the right-of-way vacation associated with this  
approval failed on a 4-4 vote.  
Mr. Walker also announced that the City Council appeal of the Airport  
Road rezoning denial from the February meeting is scheduled for  
March 24th.  
Mr. Walker added that the minutes from the February 11th meeting  
would be brought forward for approval in April due to timing  
constraints.  
4. Approval of Minutes  
4.A.  
Minutes for the February 11, 2026, City Planning Commission meeting.  
Presenter:  
Kenneth Casey, City Planning Commission Chair  
Approval of the February minutes was postponed to the April meeting.  
5. Consent Calendar  
Motion by Vice Chair Hensler, seconded by Commissioner Slattery, to  
approve the Consent Calendar.  
The motion passed unanimously.  
9 -  
Aye:  
Chair Hensler, Commissioner Cecil, Commissioner Slattery,  
Commissioner Robbins, Casey, Commissioner Clements, Commissioner  
Gigiano, Commissioner Willoughby and Commissioner Case  
1790 South Academy - Conditional Use  
5.A.  
CUDP-25-00 A Conditional Use to allow the Minor Automobile and Light Vehicle  
Repair use with Outdoor Display of Goods accessory use in the  
MX-M (Mixed-Use Medium Scale) zone district consisting of 0.61  
acres located at 1790 South Academy Boulevard.  
(Quasi-Judicial)  
Council District 4  
Presenter:  
Kerri Schott, Planner II, City Planning Department  
Kevin Walker, Planning Director, City Planning Department  
6. Items Called Off Consent Calendar  
7. Unfinished Business  
8. New Business  
Creekridge at Flying Horse  
8.A.  
ZONE-25-00 An Ordinance to amend the zoning map of the City of Colorado  
Springs pertaining to approximately 44.72 acres located north of the  
intersection of North Powers Boulevard and Interquest Parkway from  
PDZ/AF-O (Planned Development Zone with the United States Air  
Force Academy Overlay) to R-Flex M/AF-O (R-Flex Medium with  
United States Air Force Academy Overlay). (Quasi-judicial - First  
reading and setting the public hearing for April 28, 2026, in accord  
with City Code Section 7.5.407. Hearings for the ordinance and any  
related applications shall be conducted at the second reading.)  
Related Files: LUPL-25-0023  
Located in Council District 2  
Presenter:  
Allison Stocker, Senior Planner, City Planning Department  
Kevin Walker, Planning Director, City Planning Department  
Allison Stocker, Senior Planner, presented the Creekridge at Flying  
Horse proposals, consisting of a Zone Map Amendment and a Land  
Use Plan a request to rezone approximately 44.72 acres north of the  
intersection of Interquest Parkway and Powers Boulevard from the  
existing Planned Development Zone with Air Force Academy Overlay  
(PDZ/AF-O) to R-Flex Medium with Air Force Academy Overlay  
(R-Flex M/AF-O). Ms. Stocker explained that the PDZ, approved in  
2021 as part of the Flying Horse master plan, envisioned a mixed-use  
regional activity center with substantial commercial, office, and  
hospitality  
components  
supported  
by  
higher-density  
residential  
development. She said the PDZ requirements included high minimum  
densities, prescriptive mixed-use proportions, and specific building  
form expectations that were tied to a development vision no longer  
aligned with market conditions.  
Ms. Stocker explained that commercial demand had shifted westward,  
with Interquest Marketplace, Victory Ridge, and other activity center  
developments fulfilling much of the commercial and employment needs  
previously anticipated for this site. As  
a
result, the mixed-use  
expectations of the PDZ were not as feasible anymore. The applicant  
therefore proposed converting the area to R-Flex Medium zoning,  
which would significantly reduce maximum residential density from  
approximately 1,500 units under the PDZ to roughly 580 units at full  
build-out and eliminate the commercial requirements. Ms. Stocker said  
that access points along Highway 83 and New Life Drive would remain  
consistent with previous entitlements, and the revised zoning would  
better match current land-use conditions. Standard notice was made.  
Ms. Stocker said agency review was complete, no significant  
objections had been raised, and the proposal aligned with PlanCOS  
goals for flexibility and compatibility and meets the review criteria.  
Applicant’s presentation  
Jason Alwine, NES, representing the applicant, provided a detailed  
explanation of how the area had evolved since the PDZ’s adoption. He  
noted that robust commercial nodes along I-25, Interquest Parkway,  
and Northgate had absorbed the demand originally forecasted for the  
Flying Horse subarea. Mr. Alwine explained that the existing PDZ  
permitted a wide range of commercial and employment uses that were  
now duplicative relative to surrounding development. He said requiring  
such uses would introduce market risks and delay meaningful  
development of the property. By transitioning to R-Flex Medium, the  
applicant could focus on a more realistic range of residential housing  
types,  
preserving  
open  
space  
and  
establishing  
a
3.5-acre  
neighborhood park while reducing overall traffic generation. Mr. Alwine  
described the alignment of the Black Squirrel Creek Trail through the  
site and confirmed that internal public streets would be designed to  
meet city standards.  
Public Comments  
No public comments.  
Commissioners’ Comments and Questions  
Several commissioners focused on traffic and access, especially at  
Highway 83 and New Life Drive. Mr. Alwine and staff noted that access  
points remain unchanged from prior approvals and that reduced  
density would substantially decrease traffic compared to the PDZ.  
Additional discussion centered on housing diversity, affordability, and  
the implementation status of the Flying Horse master plan. Ms. Stocker  
clarified that the master plan is considered implemented under the  
Unified Development Code (UDC) and that portions not subject to  
rezoning would remain governed by the existing concept plan.  
Commissioner Slattery expressed concern that removing the mixed-use  
elements diminished neighborhood-serving amenities and reduced  
long-term land use diversity. Commissioner Slattery argued that the  
PDZ’s vision for a more vibrant, mixed-use center aligned better with  
PlanCOS and that the proposed rezoning underutilized the site’s  
strategic location. Other commissioners stated that surrounding  
commercial growth already meets community needs and that the  
revised zoning provides more certainty, reduces intensity, and aligns  
with current demand for housing.  
Commissioner Cecil said she could not support the Creekridge at  
Flying Horse rezoning or land use plan because she felt the request  
significantly weakened the original Planned Development Zone vision  
by removing the mixed-use and commercial components intended to  
create a more balanced and amenity-supported area. Commissioner  
Cecil expressed concern that shifting to an exclusively residential  
zoning underutilized a strategically located site and reduced long-term  
land use diversity envisioned to align with PlanCOS or the  
commitments tied to the Flying Horse master plan.  
Other commissioners offered contrasting views. Vice Chair Hensler  
stated that while the PDZ’s vision was ambitious, the surrounding  
commercial development now provided ample services and retail  
options. She observed that the R-Flex Medium zoning would produce a  
more  
predictable  
and  
implementable  
development  
pattern.  
Commissioner Robbins agreed and noted that reducing density would  
lessen traffic impacts and infrastructure demands. Commissioner  
Willoughby added that the site’s context had changed significantly  
since 2021, and updating zoning to reflect realistic development  
conditions served both the neighborhood and the city.  
Motion by Vice Chair Hensler, seconded by Commissioner Clements,  
to recommend approval to City Council of a zone change consisting  
of approximately 44.72 acres located north of the intersection of  
North Powers Boulevard and Interquest Parkway from PDZ (Planned  
Development Zone) to R-Flex Medium/AF-O (R-Flex Medium with  
United States Air Force Academy Overlay) based upon the finding that  
the request complies with the criteria for a Zoning Map Amendment  
set forth in City Code Section 7.5.704.  
The motion passed by a vote of 7-2-0-0.  
7 -  
Aye:  
No:  
Chair Hensler, Commissioner Robbins, Casey, Commissioner  
Clements, Commissioner Gigiano, Commissioner Willoughby and  
Commissioner Case  
2 - Commissioner Cecil and Commissioner Slattery  
8.B.  
LUPL-25-002 Establishment of the Creekside at Flying Horse Land Use Plan for  
medium density residential and parks consisting of approximately  
44.72 acres located north of the intersection of North Powers  
Boulevard and Interquest Parkway.  
(Quasi-judicial)  
Council District: 2  
Presenter:  
Allison Stocker, Senior Planner, City Planning Department  
Kevin Walker, Planning Director, City Planning Department  
Motion by Vice Chair Hensler, seconded by Commissioner  
Willoughby, to Recommend approval to City Council the Creekridge at  
Flying Horse Land Use Plan based upon the finding that the proposal  
complies with the review criteria for the Land Use Plans set forth in  
City Code Section 7.5.514.  
The motion passed by a vote of 7-2-0-0.  
7 -  
Aye:  
No:  
Chair Hensler, Commissioner Robbins, Casey, Commissioner  
Clements, Commissioner Gigiano, Commissioner Willoughby and  
Commissioner Case  
2 - Commissioner Cecil and Commissioner Slattery  
Amendment to UDC Text - 7.5.5 Administrative Decisions  
8.C.  
CODE-26-00 An Ordinance amending Article 5 (Administration and Enforcement)  
of Chapter 7 (Unified Development Code) of the Code of the City of  
Colorado Springs 2001, as amended, pertaining to procedural  
process  
(Legislative)  
Located in Council Districts Citywide  
Presenter:  
Daniel Sexton, LUR/DRE Planning Manager, City Planning  
Department  
Kevin Walker, Planning Director, City Planning Department  
Daniel Sexton, Planning Manager, presented an ordinance amending  
Article 5 of the Unified Development Code. He explained that following  
adoption of the UDC in 2023, several administrative inconsistencies and  
omissions were identified. He said key elements for the changes include:  
·
Clarifying that recommendations from the Planning Commission,  
Downtown Review Board, and Historic Preservation Board are not  
appealable actions, as final decisions rest with City Council.  
·
Refining the relationship between development plans and  
conditional uses, confirming that development plans need not  
automatically accompany conditional use applications unless  
required by the Planning Manager.  
·
·
Expanding applicability of adjustments and variances to include  
certain use-specific standards, enabling applicants to seek relief  
from numerical requirements under Commission review.  
Clarifying post-decision actions, including expiration timelines for  
variances and requirements for extensions.  
Mr. Sexton explained that these amendments are narrowly focused on  
improving clarity and correcting unintentional gaps in the code.  
Mr. Sexton proposed a final amendment, the removal of the modification to  
the requirement for “minutes at all Planning Commission proceedings”, that  
could be interpreted to require minutes for informal work sessions, which  
historically have not been recorded in that manner. Concerns were raised  
centered on transparency, public trust, and potential legal vulnerability.  
Commissioner Cecil, Commissioner Slattery, Commissioner Case and  
Commissioner Robbins expressed hesitation noting that although work  
sessions are informal and non-voting, they still include important  
presentations, early staff guidance, agenda adjustments, and discussions  
that may meaningfully inform later decisions, suggesting these activities  
warrant some level of documentation. Commissioner Cecil emphasized  
that eliminating minutes could appear to weaken transparency and might  
leave the Commission exposed if informal discussions were later  
scrutinized. Commissioner Slattery and others added that some record of  
informational briefings could benefit both applicants and the public, even if  
less detailed than formal minutes. Commissioners agreed that the  
proposal had arisen too late in the process without sufficient notice, and  
most supported postponing or separating the minutes provision for further  
review while advancing the rest of the UDC amendments.  
Motion by Commissioner Cecil, seconded by Commissioner  
Willoughby, to recommend approval to City Council of the adoption of  
the Administration and Enforcement Ordinance amending Chapter 7  
("Unified Development Code") of the Code of the City of Colorado  
Springs 2001, as amended, relating to procedural process changes  
for various entitlement application types, based upon the finding that  
the request complies with the criteria set forth in City Code Section  
7.5.702.  
The motion passed unanimously.  
9 -  
Aye:  
Chair Hensler, Commissioner Cecil, Commissioner Slattery,  
Commissioner Robbins, Casey, Commissioner Clements,  
Commissioner Gigiano, Commissioner Willoughby and Commissioner  
Case  
9. Presentations  
10. Executive Session  
11. Adjourn