and omitting the portrayal of Ballot Question 300 as a limited, regulated,
legalization of recreational marijuana will mislead voters.
Mr. Gruskin stated referring to Ballot Question 300 as an initiated
Ordinance is not as accurate as describing it as a voter approved
Ordinance and it impossible for City Council to argue that voters were
confused by Ballot Question 300 because Section 5 of Resolution 106- 24
which put Ballot Question 300 on the ballot specifically refers to the
Initiative Review Committee and Title Board that the Council ratified,
approved, and confirmed the ballot title which illustrates that the title was
fair and neutral. He stated if voters were confused, they ignored their legal
remedies to address those concerns and if the City Council refers a ballot
measure with a ballot title that is incomplete or misleading, the proponents
of Ballot Question 300 will use those judicial remedies and if the court
changes any part of the ballot title, this measure like would not be voted on
because the Charter requires that a repeal of a voter adopted measure can
only be done at a General Municipal Election which means if the ballot
measure does not go on the 2025 ballot, it would have to wait until the 2027
ballot and business will have been in operation for more than two years. He
suggested that City Council either trust their voters had an understanding of
a clear ballot title that the Title Board and City Council approved, and they
were not confused and defeat the proposed Resolution or make the repeal
ballot title a fair, clear, and easily defensible one.
Mr. Gruskin proposed that City Council submit a ballot title which states
“Shall the voter-approved Ordinance that appeared as Ballot Question 300
in the November 5, 2024 election be repealed to eliminate City provisions
that: permit recreational marijuana sales by City-regulated marijuana
businesses in the City of Colorado Springs; prohibit the sale or transfer of
retail/recreational marijuana to any person under 21 or the possession of
retail/recreational marijuana by any person at any public or private school,
daycare, or preschool; authorize only existing medical marijuana licensees
to apply to become licensed as recreational marijuana businesses; limit
the number of recreational marijuana licenses to the number of existing
medical marijuana licenses; and generate tax revenue on recreational
marijuana for public safety programs, mental health services, and
post-traumatic stress disorder treatment programs for veterans?”
Citizens Renz Waddington, Karen Crummy, Tom Scudder, Karly Van
Arnam, Kent Jarnig, Mark Frueling, Dustin Taylor, Will Clark, Luther Bonow,
Aaron Bluse, Levi Hays, Timothy Pollet, Robert Cochran, Janelle Bowman,
John Mark, James Mark, Peter Green, Patrick Sipes, Chad Ricketts,